Originally written as a reply to the below video... a very worthwhile presentation.
The concept is quite important.
"absorbed by poor people who think it's uncool to be educated"
This notion is what prevents people in the *information age* from allowing themselves... *allowing themselves*.... access to the incredible breadth of knowledge humanity has compiled. Not even to ultimately glorify the knowledge of humans beyond all other - we have access to *natural* knowledge as well! How beautiful to learn of glaciers, to learn of deep sea, to look far into the cosmos, to conceptualize the water table, etc etc its a wonderful world to experience! To view aspects of nature inaccessible otherwise...
But such vision is not for certain demographics... if people accept the arbitrary labels placed upon them for arbitrary reasons - they may not look beyond music videos, entertainment media, sports... and as such be exposed to a series of images with a clear intent: manipulation.
The forest is not "manipulative"... to see it one will not be forced to accept cultural stereotypes - consequently enforcing the concept in future dealings... who in such a setting would even conceive of such a thing?
But, as said... its "uncool" to be, I'd use the word: "intelligent". Education they dole out freely - education in the form of programming. Intelligent people can think through the fallacious claims, educated people merely know the information - many educated people don't know WHY they know, but they act accordingly... that is, one may be quite well educated regarding (reality TV show family, sports team, actor, propaganda news outlet, carefully curated talk shows, game shows, video games of complete immersion...) as they have come to that information episodically and repetitiously for often times the majority of waking life... they have gathered education - particularly the knowledge that brings their return to such presentation, but the intelligence to find a generally better course of action has not been encouraged - rather discouraged, likely within the content of the presentation.. as.. its "uncool" to be "intelligent".
Thus... many would never start such a video as this... and if they did, they would block the information presented by the internal dialogue amounting to "this isn't for me!"... such is the source of a variety of "mental illness": a suggestion that overrides the acceptance of reality and prevents/alters analysis.
As the information is laid out... none need be a "director" in this age... we must only break people from the vicious cycle that prevents them from freely exploring the great truth of existence. As they freely explore they will naturally break out of the patterns set forth for them by those who wish to control and dominate the human domain.
Moreso than “how”… I concern myself with “why”.
What exactly are our goals for the future?
Working broadly down to the specific:
Developing conceptual hierarchy and executing.
Whereby, the underlying desire is to shift the power structure to something more universally democratic-more generally involving. That we have opportunity to support the causes we deem fit and NOT support what we do not agree with.
Are arbiters required? In a world attending mostly to posting and commenting on pictures/consuming entertainment… yes — they are truly unfit to make large scale, tremendous implication decisions as they are woefully unaware of the variables and would rather watch cartoons than calculate possible societal outcomes.
Let them watch cartoons?
By democratizing systems without arbitration… we enable the societal “end user” to take part — directly-in the formation of complex decision making/strategizing. Given the opportunity I am well certain the attention of many would draw away from “cartoons” and they would grow to some degree more informed in a general sense .
As such, the underlying desire of a power structure shift is realized as people take upon themselves the power of directly democratized decision. Thus, talking suits spouting “I’m on your side” are less likely to gain unquestioned loyalty.. and perhaps, in general, we would begin to see an increase in responsible action.
This is more or less “why” setting such ideals in motion becomes worthwhile. Exactly our implementation — particularly in dealing with established institutions — is a matter of great debate. If we may agree upon deeply correlated goals, we may be able to find common ground upon the new horizon.
Viewing interpersonal communication
At a rate
Entertaining scripted characters
Falling In Love
Feeling the Sun
Warming the Soul
Friends to the illusions
Giving to AI
The Ability To Process.
Of Collective Enhancement.
Reality Tangible – Pondered In Unison
With Purposeful Intentional
Factors of Input.
Questions of Output,
Acquisition of Data as Witnessed. The eyes of many see as they must.
For the Monolithic Shell Persists
Only to Contain
The Creation -
Of Collective Enhancement.
In envisioning the future
Semantically - prison
Practically - observational center
Though infinite, finite (apparent) forms of existence
Must examine probability
To find reasonable course
Upon the center (this moment)
Permutations upon physical probability surround
In linear form,
Each idea, each relative possibility
A new panopticon, smaller
Each iteration linear - the view narrows
No return - emergence required
Conclusively - death be the only option.